<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 7: Time&#8217;s Arrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/episode-7-times-arrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/episode-7-times-arrow/</link>
	<description>A Podcast on the History of Science, Medicine, and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Willem-Jan</title>
		<link>http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/episode-7-times-arrow/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Willem-Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/?p=37#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hello,

First time ever I&#039;ve been listening to a podcast, and I&#039;m enjoying it thoroughly! So first I&#039;d like to say: keep up the good work! 

I still got some episodes to go, but I was especially intrigued by &#039;weirdness of time&#039; essay. I&#039;ll definitely give that one another listen, but I already have a comment / remark / question: 
It&#039;s of course fascinating that none of the &#039;big sciences&#039; as relativity and quantum theory have an directionality in time. However, usually thermodynamic entropy is the only physical quantity which is  directional. I don&#039;t think this was really mentioned in the essay (perhaps I&#039;m wrong though ;) ). Anyway it got me wondering about how the increase of entropy is associated with the probability distribution, i.e. milk mixes in coffee because it&#039;s the most probable thing to happen! Is then time not merely our interpretation of what&#039;s more likely to happen? Of course that still leaves me somewhat confused on the subject of things happening sequentially... 
I see a lot of book recommendations, if anyone can recommend me one that deals more with these kinds of issues, let me know!

I&#039;m also looking forward to the evolution/ID episodes. Even though I live in Amsterdam (the Netherlands), where the whole issue isn&#039;t that widely discussed, I&#039;m still interested about what your podcast will have to say about it, especially on the historic perspective.

Cheers,
Willem-Jan van Zeist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>First time ever I&#8217;ve been listening to a podcast, and I&#8217;m enjoying it thoroughly! So first I&#8217;d like to say: keep up the good work! </p>
<p>I still got some episodes to go, but I was especially intrigued by &#8216;weirdness of time&#8217; essay. I&#8217;ll definitely give that one another listen, but I already have a comment / remark / question:<br />
It&#8217;s of course fascinating that none of the &#8216;big sciences&#8217; as relativity and quantum theory have an directionality in time. However, usually thermodynamic entropy is the only physical quantity which is  directional. I don&#8217;t think this was really mentioned in the essay (perhaps I&#8217;m wrong though <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). Anyway it got me wondering about how the increase of entropy is associated with the probability distribution, i.e. milk mixes in coffee because it&#8217;s the most probable thing to happen! Is then time not merely our interpretation of what&#8217;s more likely to happen? Of course that still leaves me somewhat confused on the subject of things happening sequentially&#8230;<br />
I see a lot of book recommendations, if anyone can recommend me one that deals more with these kinds of issues, let me know!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also looking forward to the evolution/ID episodes. Even though I live in Amsterdam (the Netherlands), where the whole issue isn&#8217;t that widely discussed, I&#8217;m still interested about what your podcast will have to say about it, especially on the historic perspective.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Willem-Jan van Zeist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/episode-7-times-arrow/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/?p=37#comment-49</guid>
		<description>From someone you &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; know...

I have been listening regularly since Episode 4, and greatly appreciate what you&#039;re doing.  To my knowledge there aren&#039;t a whole lot of podcasts devoted primarily to the history of science and technology.  Please keep it up!

I am also very much looking forward to the upcoming Evolution/ID episodes, particularly with regard to how alternatives to evolution are being pushed by popular movements and what this sort of thing might mean for the future of the practice of science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From someone you <i>don&#8217;t</i> know&#8230;</p>
<p>I have been listening regularly since Episode 4, and greatly appreciate what you&#8217;re doing.  To my knowledge there aren&#8217;t a whole lot of podcasts devoted primarily to the history of science and technology.  Please keep it up!</p>
<p>I am also very much looking forward to the upcoming Evolution/ID episodes, particularly with regard to how alternatives to evolution are being pushed by popular movements and what this sort of thing might mean for the future of the practice of science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
